Dangerous Dogs Essay - 593 Words - StudyMode.
English Essay Response - Should Pitbulls Be Banned The debate about whether or not new laws governing dangerous dogs has once again been set aflame with the death of a 4 year old girl, Ayen Chol, at the hands of a pit-bull. Two articles appeared in the Herald Sun on August 19th 2011, stating whether or not pit bulls “with training and love.
The most relevant statute to the case facts is the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 (DDA) which sets out the framework within which dangerous dogs can be dealt with when they become dangerous. (Bird 2007). The key fact here is that Dave does not supervise the dogs whilst they are running through the fields for approximately twenty minutes.
Sniffer dogs are used by the Customs Unit and the police force has a Police Canine Unit that has dogs specially trained to detect drugs and other dangerous substances like bombs. The disadvantages of having pets relate mostly to responsibility of caring for them.
The Dangerous Dogs Act amendment made in 1997 added a caveat that in individual cases, a specific dog may be added to the index by issue of a Court Order at the discretion of the court in question. All dogs currently listed on the index or considered legally as specially controlled dogs must be neutered, microchipped and tattooed with an identification number, registered on the index, insured.
The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. This website is a response to the UK Dangerous Dogs ACT 1991. It is my opinion that the law is a bad one and should be repealed. While many dog experts agree that the law is innappropriate and inneffective, there seems to be little chance of it being struck off at present.
It’s against the law to let a dog be dangerously out of control anywhere, such as: in a public place in a private place, for example a neighbour’s house or garden in the owner’s home.
The Dangerous Dogs Act (DDA) has been in place in the UK since 1991, making it 25 years old this year. This means that the Act has been in the news a lot this year, raising questions that have never really gone away since the Act first came to pass about whether or not the law is actually effective, or if it only serves to cause worry and heartache for owners of certain types of dogs, which.